Turnkey mainframe migration · AI-driven · Equivalence-gated
Vectorshift is a complete, governed service for migrating COBOL mainframe estates to a GPU/CPU-enabled cloud. We take your code and documentation, review it, rebuild it, deploy it, migrate the data, test it — and prove, byte for byte, that nothing changed but the platform.
An estimated 220–800 billion lines of COBOL remain in production. The average COBOL developer is in their late 50s, roughly 10% retire every year, and about 70% of universities no longer teach the language.
Mainframe software is typically 30–50% of the total mainframe budget, large estates pay roughly $1,000–2,000 per MIPS per year, and pricing keeps trending up.
Migration is the highest-stakes project an enterprise runs. The industry's failures — a UK bank locked 1.9M customers out in 2018 — happened because systems were validated by inspection, not by proof.
We are equally honest about the other side: mainframes are reliable and cheap per workload. Our argument is the skills cliff, the licensing trajectory, and the strategic cost of lock-in — not that the mainframe is broken.
The workload's own characteristics decide which path it takes. We deliver all three.
Business logic re-implemented in a modern stack — vectorized Python/NumPy, Java services, or GPU-native dataframes. Removes the COBOL dependency entirely, unlocks modern tooling and AI integration.
The same source, compiled by open-source GnuCOBOL on commodity instances, with JCL batch orchestration re-expressed as cloud-native schedulers. Fastest and lowest-risk; modernize function by function later.
AI reads the estate — code, copybooks, JCL, runbooks — extracts business rules, and drafts translations and test suites. Humans review and sign every artifact; the equivalence gate verifies it. AI proposes; the gate disposes.
| Workload characteristic | Path |
|---|---|
| High data volume, aggregations, ETL-heavy | Move off COBOL — GPU/CPU vectorized tier |
| Logic-dense, low volume, thin test coverage | Rehost COBOL on cloud |
| Regulatory freeze, zero tolerance for change | Rehost COBOL on cloud |
| Medium complexity, staged transition | AI-assisted, then per-function decision |
Seven phases. Governance artifacts at every step, inspectable by you at any time.
Vendors market automation rates — “99.7% automated”. An automation rate is a claim about effort. It says nothing about correctness.
Our acceptance criterion is mechanical: exact fixed-point arithmetic (money stays integer cents, provably exact), byte-exact outputs (field values, totals, ordering, formatting), and continuous enforcement (the check runs in CI, in benchmarks, and during dual-run).
We do not promise a percentage. We promise a measurement.
compare_outputs(legacy, migrated)
final_balances.csv IDENTICAL
summary_report.csv IDENTICAL
45/45 records validated
0 mismatches
A representative COBOL batch program — per-account aggregation over transaction files — re-implemented four ways and benchmarked at three scales. Three cold-cache runs each. Every output byte-identical to the COBOL reference.
| Scale | COBOL (baseline) | NumPy (CPU) | RAPIDS cuDF (GPU) | RAPIDS cuPy (GPU) | Numba (CPU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M rows | 1.00x | 1.1x | 0.2x | 0.3x | 0.6x |
| 10M rows | 1.00x | 2.5x | 2.0x | 2.0x | 2.2x |
| 100M rows | 1.00x | 3.1x | 11.9x | 10.9x | 3.5x |
The honest detail: at 1M rows the GPU loses — 0.2x — because transfer overhead exceeds compute savings. We publish the crossover because it is our policy engine: workloads that justify acceleration get GPUs; everything else gets the right tier. You never pay for acceleration that does not accelerate.
The test every migrated platform must pass: the day demand hits ten times normal. Tax time for a revenue agency. Month-end for a bank.
Migrated online workloads become stateless, horizontally-scalable services behind load balancers. Auto-scaling on request rate and latency SLOs; the data tier scales independently. Capacity is rehearsed against replays of captured production peak traffic.
GPU and CPU node pools pre-warm before the season opens and expand with the work queue. Spot fleets add cost-efficient burst capacity for checkpointable jobs; reserved capacity guarantees the floor. Sharded workloads add shards.
For every peak season we deliver the demand forecast from your run statistics, the capacity plan, the pre-warm runbook, SLOs with alerting — and the seasonal cost model. Peak days become a planned, budgeted, rehearsed event.
Beyond one GPU: workloads shard by business key — account, customer, policy — never by time, preserving inter-row semantics per shard. One L4/L40S-class GPU processes roughly 100M rows of our reference workload in seconds; larger estates partition across GPUs and nodes with near-linear scaling.
A representative estate, end to end, in six months. The calendar is fixed; the scope scales through parallel migration waves — each one safe because every function carries its own byte-exact proof.
| Program phase | Weeks | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Grab + Review (discovery) | 1–4 | Code and documentation intake; AI-assisted inventory; hot-path ranking; data-interface catalog; replication test environment |
| Rebuild + Deploy + Migrate data | 5–16 | Parallel migration waves — every function re-implemented or rehosted on its tier and equivalence-proven before it proceeds |
| Test + shadow run | 17–20 | Dual-run against production through a full business cycle, reconciled continuously |
| Roll over + decommission | 21–24 | Per-function cutover, parallel-run sign-off, decommissioning, handover |
| Managed run (ongoing) | 25+ | SLO-managed operation, seasonal peak plans, continuous equivalence monitoring |
A worked example: nightly batch of 100M transactions, 3 hours of daily processing, one L40S-class GPU instance plus one CPU instance, 2 TB object storage, 200 GB monthly egress.
Roughly $380/month on AWS on-demand, before spot and commitment discounts — an 87–95% reduction against a conservative $3,000–8,000/month mainframe allocation.
Fixed-fee discovery, fixed-fee migration per job tier, optional managed-run support. Fees quote against your assessed function inventory, not hours.
| Offering | Indicative range |
|---|---|
| Discovery (one-off) | $150k – $900k |
| Migration — small job | $50k – $120k |
| Migration — medium job | $150k – $450k |
| Migration — large job | $500k – $2M |
| Managed-run support | $10k – $50k / month |
| Outcome fee (optional) | 10–20% of measured year-one savings |
Acceptance criteria are contractual: byte-exact equivalence and the benchmark evidence. All figures are indicative planning ranges, not quotes.
A discovery engagement typically runs 2–6 weeks per workload cluster and produces the function inventory, the data-interface catalog, the test-environment plan, and a fixed-fee migration proposal — with no production change.
Email: [email protected]
Read the comprehensive white paper The Governed Exit (short)